Forex Pips – Guide To Profitable Forex Spread Betting Rotating Header Image

The Incredible Impact of the Words “Made in China”

The “Dress code” section on the bar’s website says it all:

“Come dressed glamorously: we love glam grunge, glam & groovy or haute glam couture, but leave the flip-flops and board shorts at the beach…”

Shanghai is not the kind of city most expect to see when they visit the world’s largest “Emerging Market.”

Perched on the 6th floor of a stunning art deco building in the famous Bund district, this trendy bar (which we will not name for fear of receiving free drinks when we visit again tonight) offers an appetizing taste of the Shanghai of tomorrow, or perhaps even of today. The clientele is a cosmopolitan mix of expats and upper-middle class Shanghainese. We’re told the cocktails and fusion tapas plates are among the best in the city. And that’s to say nothing of the spectacular views…

Shanghai Skyline

Amazingly, the Pudong area, which you can see just across the Huangpu River in the nearby photo, did not even exist 20 years ago. Construction on the New Open Economic Development Zone, which has grown to become China’s pulsing financial and commercial hub, only really began in the early 1990s…right around the time the nation’s economy embarked on a two-decade long, double-digit annual growth rate transformation.

“This,” the unapologetically capitalistic city seems to scream out, “is what ‘Made in China’ built for us.”

While the “Developed” world spent the better part of the last few decades buying knick-knacks they didn’t need with money they didn’t have, China Inc. got busy both producing those same products, and lending the world’s consumers the money with which to buy them. The result is one of the largest trade imbalances in modern economic history. At a staggering .4 trillion, the Middle Kingdom’s foreign reserve stockpile is by far the largest in the world. And, although a not-insignificant 0 billion of those reserves are held in steadily depreciating greenbacks (not to mention a large euro holding), the Chinese are wasting no time converting those paper cash piles into tangible asset stakes.

As we mentioned earlier in the week, China has been on a resource-buying binge over the past ten years, inking deals with major mining companies from Africa to Australia, South America, The Middle East and all over Asia.

Just last month China signed more than .8 billion of new commercial and mining deals with resource giant Australia, despite its southern neighbor’s onerous new resource profits tax laws. The Middle Kingdom’s voracious industrialization inhaled around .7 billion worth of Australia’s minerals in 2009, including almost billion of iron ore and concentrates.

Last year China also became Brazil’s number one trading partner when it agreed to lend billion to Petrobras in return for guaranteed oil supply over the next decade. Other projects between China and its South American BRIC counterpart included a billion steel plant at the Acu port in Rio de Janeiro state. That deal represents China’s largest ever investment in Latin America’s richest resource economy and its biggest foreign steel-plant investment.

The world’s fastest growing economic superpower is also looking closer to home in an effort to feed its unwavering appetite and to divest itself of paper promises.

“Central Asia is rich in mineral resources, particularly rare metals, copper and gold that China needs for economic growth,” President Hu Jintao announced on a recent visit to Central Asia, where he signed gas and nuclear agreements and promised cooperation in port construction and transportation infrastructure.

Conspicuously absent from these and a slew of other high profile deals were the “emerged” markets. While the Petrobras deal was going down, for instance, politicians in the US were eagerly handing out hundreds of billions of other people’s dollars to Goldman Sachs (via AIG), and bribing its citizens to purchase new kitchen appliances…most of which were probably made in China anyway.

Of course, all this stimulation comes at a terrible cost. Not only must the US economy swallow the opportunity cost (of the goods and services that might have been produced had those trillions not been siphoned off to bailout the nation’s failed banking/insurance/auto industries), it must also contend with seemingly uncontrollable debt loads. Barely 9 months into the current financial year, the US this week passed the trillion annual deficit mark. Though marginally smaller than last year’s total at this point, such a figure is hardly cause for celebration. The world’s most indebted economy – on a gross basis – is also notching up a worrying tally of single day records.

The Washington Times reports:

The one-day increase for June 30 totaled 5,931,038,264.30 – bigger than the entire annual deficit for fiscal year 2007 and larger than the 0 billion in savings the new health care bill will produce over its first 10 years. The figure works out to nearly ,500 for every US household, or more than 10 times the median daily household income.

And now that the future demand has been brought forward, through “Cash for Clunkers” and other myopic policy disasters, the western superpower is struggling to keep its economy afloat. They’ve spent their savings AND their future earnings.

Meanwhile, China is struggling to cool its own economy down. It’s all the government here can do to keep a lid on growth at 11.9% – the figure recorded in the first quarter of this year. Stronger domestic demand and a rebound in exports forced the IMF to upwardly revise its outlook for China’s 2010 GDP, from 10% to 10.5%. Housing prices are still rising by an incredible 12.4% per month, according to the latest available figures, even after Beijing introduced a series of tightening measures aimed at dampening real estate speculation.

Almost nobody expects China to keep such a breakneck pace. In fact, many are warning of sharp corrections ahead. But as our fellow reckoners are well aware, nothing moves up or down without (sometimes major) corrections. Straight lines are for geometry classes, not markets. Over the long haul, however, the trend is pretty clear.

Wandering around the bustling, high-end shopping streets and funky fusion eateries here in Shanghai, it’s difficult to imagine the emerging middle-class consumers returning to the lot of lowly-paid factory worker without a struggle; almost as difficult as it is to imagine an American working for less than the minimum wage…but not quite.

Cheers,

Joel Bowman
for The Daily Reckoning

The Incredible Impact of the Words “Made in China” originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, offers a uniquely refreshing, perspective on the global economy, investing, gold, stocks and today’s markets. Its been called “the most entertaining read of the day.”


Daily Reckoning
gold

Con-Way Inc. (NYSE:CNW) — How GDP Growth Impacts Con-Way Stock

Con-way Inc. (NYSE:CNW) is a California-based provider of transportation, logistics, and supply-chain management services, a sector where Baird has noted fluctuations in strength that relate to GDP growth. Dan Amoss, editor of Agora Financial’s Strategic Short Report, explains how the Baird finding applies to Con-way’s business prospects.

From Amoss’ latest reader update:

“On June 30, the transportation analysts at Baird published a note on the macro situation facing trucking companies, writing:

During previous cycles, it is common for early-cycle freight strength to ease during the initial stages of an economic recovery. This initial freight acceleration, as measured by year-over-year freight growth, is a factor of inventory trends amid improving economic activity and easier prior-year comparisons. As can be seen in the chart below, during previous economic cycles, freight growth experiences an initial surge above GDP growth as the economy rebounds, but eventually retrenches before reaccelerating growth to a new cycle high [emphasis added].

Here is a chart of the Baird Freight Index versus GDP growth:

“For the reasons mentioned above, I expect U.S. GDP growth to fall back towards zero in the coming quarters. If so, this would drive the Baird Freight Index — and the profit outlook for Con-Way — much lower. I doubt we’ll see a reacceleration ‘to a new cycle high’ in Baird’s Freight Index because this is not a typical GDP cycle. There simply won’t be as much demand for trucking services now that the post-crash inventory replenishment cycle is mostly behind us.

“The glut in the ‘less than truckload’ sector isn’t helping Con-Way. Con-Way aggressively priced business in 2009 to cover its fixed costs, and is seeking to raise prices in 2010. But when it asks customers for higher pricing, many will divert freight to lower-priced competitors. So whatever benefit Con-Way gets in 2010 from higher pricing should be offset by the loss of customers.”

Dan Amoss is anticipating that Con-way’s next earnings report on August 4th will shed additional light on these concerns. He also expects CNW stock to remain weak to the extent that investor flight from risk continues in the broader stock market. To find out more about Amoss’ specific recommendations for Con-way investors, you should subscribe to the Strategic Short Report. It’s available through the Agora Financial reports page, which can be found here.

Best,

Rocky Vega,
The Daily Reckoning

[Nothing in this post should be considered personalized investment advice. Agora Financial employees do not receive any type of compensation from companies covered. Investment decisions should be made in consultation with a financial advisor and only after reviewing relevant financial statements.]

Con-Way Inc. (NYSE:CNW) — How GDP Growth Impacts Con-Way Stock originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, offers a uniquely refreshing, perspective on the global economy, investing, gold, stocks and today’s markets. Its been called “the most entertaining read of the day.”


Daily Reckoning
gold

Irrational Gold Selling

Last Monday I couldn’t believe my eyes when I saw that the price of gold had dropped .20, which was weird enough since Kitco was showing the “Gold Price Change due to Weakening dollar” was up by .00, meaning gold should be going up thanks to the weakening dollar, while the “Gold Price Change due to Predominant Selling” was down a whopping .20! Wow! Selling!

Since most of the problems with my medications regimen seem to be finally solved, what could I do but laugh, although weakly, in a kind of dull, sedated babble, “Hahahahahahaha!” at the sheer incongruity of it all, instead of going off on a Manic Mogambo Tangent (MMT) of some kind, probably either about how the Federal Reserve has destroyed the dollar by creating too many of them, or, on a more timely topic, about what idiots the sellers of gold are.

Apparently, these market-timing geniuses have failed to understand that that this is the Perfect Freaking Time (PFT) to buy gold, because here they are, selling! Hahaha!

Observant Junior Mogambo Rangers (JMRs) have taken note of the fact that my laugh is less than the usual Loud Mogambo Laugh Of Scorn (LMLOS) of story and song, and instead is a weak, nervous, “I wish I was dead!” titter of laughter, like the time when you came sneaking into the house or office early in the morning or late in the afternoon, respectively, stumbling drunk, trying to be quiet, wearing your own underwear like a weird hat for some reason that you can’t recall, and your mom, wife or boss was waiting for you.

And the reason for my lack of uproarious mirth is that something is, in a word, weird. I mean, selling gold right now is so devoid of reason that I want to laugh heartily at the idea and at the stupid people that got the idea to sell gold, but I can just sit here, dumbfounded, shaking my head in disbelief and tittering nervously.

Obviously, I am now of the “buy and hold” camp instead of the “trader” type of person, as I have “discovered” many important things about trading stocks, bonds, commodities and their derivatives, and by “discovered” I mean “scarred and bloodied by slimy insiders, with still-festering open wounds and tender scars, both emotional and financial.”

And all of it could have been completely avoided if I had read Nassim Taleb’s book The Black Swan and found that the bell-curve of normal probability is not how things really work over the long term, or if I had internalized the related discoveries of non-linear systems (“Chaos Theory”), or if I had a wife that had said, “Don’t be an idiot! You are too stupid, too ignorant and full of too much Bizarre Mogambo Crap (BMC) for you to ever – EVER! – succeed as a trader of anything! Get a job and go to work, work, work!”

Instead, I made the mistake of having a real-life wife who said “Whatever you do, I will support you and love you!” which, now that I am looking back, makes me scream at her, “That’s the most stupid thing you have ever said because you know what a whack-job, paranoid, worthless, lazy lunatic I am! So all my failures are your fault! Your fault! All your fault!”

However, buying gold, silver and oil in defense against the horrific inflations in prices that will destroy us, thanks to the horrid Federal Reserve creating too much money so that the despicable Obama administration can deficit-spend us into bankruptcy and utter destruction, is all my idea.

I got the idea from 4,500 years of historical precedents of one moronic country after another doing this same, stupid “spending oneself into bankruptcy” thing, all you can do is say, “Whee! This investing stuff is easy!”

The Mogambo Guru
for The Daily Reckoning

Irrational Gold Selling originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, offers a uniquely refreshing, perspective on the global economy, investing, gold, stocks and today’s markets. Its been called “the most entertaining read of the day.”


Daily Reckoning
gold

Shouldn’t do it; couldn’t do it anyway

Paul Krugman, Martin Wolf and the other big spenders are remarkably resilient. And cunning. On their advice, the world’s governments put up as much as 4 years’ worth of the entire planet’s savings to bring about a ‘recovery.’ On the evidence of the last couple of weeks, it didn’t work.

In the world’s leading economy, 8 million jobs have been lost. The US government disappeared almost a million jobseekers from the unemployment lists in the last two months to try to make the numbers look better. Still, fewer people have jobs now than when the stimulus began. Those workers with jobs earn less than they did then. And those who lose their jobs wait longer than ever to find a new one. Housing is sinking again, too, with nearly half of all the mortgaged houses already worth less than their mortgages. Illinois has stopped paying its bills. California is laying people off wholesale.

But instead of falling on their swords in shame, the economists behind the stimulus efforts are positioning themselves for an ‘I told you so,’ moment.

In our last installment, Britain and Euroland had just turned towards austerity. Alone among the Western nations, the United States of America pledged to stay the course, continuing its program of counter-cyclical stimulus. Then, last week, the US Senate rejected a measure to extend unemployment benefits. Suddenly, we’re all austerians now.

Krugman was quick to distance himself: “as I and others have been arguing at length, penny-pinching in the midst of a severely depressed economy is no way to deal with our long-run budget problems. And penny-pinching at the expense of the unemployed is cruel as well as misguided.”

‘Spend now; cut later,’ is still his advice. But with so much spending…and so little to show for it…you’d think he’d be shy about proposing more. At least, he might feel the burden of proof more heavily upon his shoulders. Is there any evidence that increased government spending – even in time of private sector retrenching – makes people better off? And even if ‘spend now, cut later’ were good advice, is there any evidence that they can actually do it? None that we know of.

Based on the experience of the ’80s and ’90s, we observed last week that it didn’t seem to matter what governments did or what they said…the markets went about their business. Today, we add a further provocation.

Let us take a look back at the penultimate budget of the Clinton years:

“Eight years ago, our future was at risk,” Bill Clinton congratulated himself on Sept. 27, 2000. “Economic growth was low, unemployment was high, interest rates were high, the federal debt had quadrupled in the previous 12 years. When Vice President Gore and I took office, the budget deficit was 0 billion, and it was projected this year the budget deficit would be 5 billion.”

The Clinton team claimed to have turned things around. They claimed credit for a budget surplus of 2 billion. This was the third surplus in a quartet…the only surpluses in US budget history after 1972. That year may be significant. Before then, the world did business in dollars backed by gold; if a nation spent too much, its gold would be called away to settle its debt. After that, the US could spend as much as it wanted; the gold parked in Ft. Knox stayed put.

And so the deficits grew year after year like the children of Abraham. But in the ’90s, a remarkable thing happened. Practically the entire developed world began running fiscal surpluses. The US. Canada. Sweden. Finland. Europe. The entire OECD. From deficits of about 1% of GDP, budgets improved, with surpluses of about 2% by the end of the ’90s. This seemed to prove that civilized men and women, even in the time of paper money, can get control of their budgets. We already knew they could ‘spend now.’ It was beginning to look like they could ‘cut later’ too.

In June 2000, Clinton administration economists predicted that the surpluses would keep coming, rising to as much as trillion over the next 10 years. But the US economy seems to have gone from Heaven to Hell in less than a decade. The race that turned deficits into surpluses lost its magic touch within 18 months. By 2002 deficits were back. And they were staggering, nearly trillion worth of deficits in 2009 and 2010 alone.

The economists completely misunderstood what was going on. The triumph they celebrated was not in themselves but in their stars. They had just been lucky. Bill Clinton’s administration had kept up spending just as the Reagan team had before them, from .4 trillion in ’94 to .8 trillion in 2001. But interest rates fell. Credit grew. And the economy boomed.

The Clinton era boom is now the Obama era bust. When the contraction hit, the feds followed the formula. They mustered their fiscal and monetary stimulus. But they got no recovery. Spending more now won’t help. Not because the Obama team is less competent than the Clinton crowd. They are just unluckier. Credit is contracting.

So Krugman will be proven right after all after all. Austerity will not bring prosperity. But then, neither would stimulus. Krugman will say ‘I told you so’…and spend the rest of his career in darkness and confirmed delusion.

Bill Bonner,
for The Daily Reckoning

Shouldn’t do it; couldn’t do it anyway originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, offers a uniquely refreshing, perspective on the global economy, investing, gold, stocks and today’s markets. Its been called “the most entertaining read of the day.”


Daily Reckoning
gold

The Economy and Market Don’t Always Agree

I don’t think the US economy is in good shape.

I am most discouraged when I consider the bloated and out-of-control federal and state governments. They spend too much. They are in too much debt. They are far too powerful. And I think it is fair to say that current administration is hostile to business. I think the US dollar is a sick currency.

But here is the thing: None of this really has much to do with investing. A lousy economy can be a great place to invest. And an economy in great health can be a terrible place to invest. It all depends on prices. All the noshing on economic data doesn’t mean much without some context. You need to know what you get for what you pay.

On that front, things don’t look so bad. As Barron’s reports, “The forward P/E on the S&P Index is below 12, the lowest since the late 1980s.” Unless profits collapse, the market overall does not look expensive. Many of the big stocks in the S&P 500 trade for 10-12 times their 2010 earnings estimate.

Keep in mind profits have already collapsed. So while profits are growing now, they are still way below pre-recession levels. We’re working off a low base.

Beyond this, I think a lot of how you feel about investing comes down to time horizon. I feel pretty good about what we own. I think the stocks we have can create a lot of value for shareholders, often in more ways than one.

But I don’t know if they’ll work in the next three months. I think long term.

Chris Mayer
for The Daily Reckoning

The Economy and Market Don’t Always Agree originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, offers a uniquely refreshing, perspective on the global economy, investing, gold, stocks and today’s markets. Its been called “the most entertaining read of the day.”


Daily Reckoning
gold