Forex Pips – Guide To Profitable Forex Spread Betting Rotating Header Image

Should

Emerging Market Investing: Why Your Portfolio Should Not Speak English

When Gen. Cornwallis surrendered to Gen. Washington after the Battle of Yorktown, the British band supposedly struck up the tune “The World Turned Upside Down.” After all, such an outcome would have been unthinkable at the start of the American Revolution.

That is in the nature of things, however. No one stays on top forever. Only recently, the mighty US consumer – long the dominant force in world trade – has lost its top seed. There is a brave new world emerging, and it has a brave new consumer. This time, it’s Americans that might want to strike up that old ballad.

Consumers in emerging markets are now the dominant consumer group in the world, surpassing the US. We’ve crossed an important threshold. Emerging Market economies now represent about 33% of consumer spending worldwide. US consumer spending, at 27% of worldwide GDP, trails for behind. As recently as 2006, US consumer spending was greater than that of the Emerging Market economies.

As The Economist notes, “The emerging world is enjoying the most spectacular growth in history.” Some of the growth rates are just blistering. Thailand grew 15% on an annualized basis in the fourth quarter. Taiwan grew 18%. “Multinationals expect about 70% of the world’s growth over the next few years to come from emerging markets,” The Economist adds, “with 40% coming from just two countries, China and India.”

It’s a great time to be an investor as we witness this history-making shift in global markets that will surely create great opportunities for us. Just look around and you can see the impact already.

For instance, Coca-Cola reported a 20% increase in first-quarter profits despite the fact that North American sales declined. Sales in emerging markets, such as India (up 29%) and Turkey (up 18%), made it possible. About 75% of Coca-Cola’s sales are now overseas. This is just one example. There is a whole slew of iconic companies that now generate more sales overseas than in the US. It’s still early.

The next big consumer market to open up might be Indonesia. It’s the world’s fourth largest population, behind China, India and the US, with 240 million people. Ford just opened its first dealership here. Honda says it can’t make motorcycles fast enough. And H.J. Heinz reports that Indonesia is a big part of why its Asia sales rose 41% last year.

So the long-awaited emergence of the emerging markets consumer is at hand. More than that, the emerging markets are also becoming a source of innovative ideas. Fortune 500 companies are happy to set up brainy shops in emerging markets. They already have 98 R&D facilities in China and 63 in India. GE has a vast R&D facility in Bangalore, its biggest in the world. Cisco is spending billion on a second HQ, also in Bangalore. Accenture has a quarter of its work force in India. Microsoft’s biggest R&D center, outside of Redmond, is in Beijing.

And they are enjoying tremendous success. For example, GE’s Bangalore laboratory invented a new hand-held electrocardiogram that sells for 0, instead of the usual ,000. The cost per test is only per patient.

As The Economist put it, emerging markets have become a “fizzing cocktail of creativity.” Moreover, it’s not just Western companies doing the creative work. (Huawei, a Chinese telecom giant, is now the world’s fourth largest patent applicant.) Companies in China, India and other places outside the US are inventing game-changing technologies. A few of the stories The Economist highlights in its report are simply amazing.

In Chennai, a Tata company created a water purifier that uses rice husks – a common waste product. A family can enjoy bacteria-free water for the grand price of . New filters every few months will cost . It’s cheap and portable and will make a big impact on the poor the world over, most of whom lack access to clean water.

Another Indian manufacturer concocted a fridge that runs on batteries! A Chinese company, Mindray, makes a lithium battery for , compared with previously. Bharti Airtel, an Indian company, has the lowest cell phone fees in the world – 2 cents a minute and nationwide coverage. The company is worth billion.

One of the most startling tales was that of Devi Shetty. He is applying Henry Ford’s assembly-line techniques to hospitals. Shetty’s flagship hospital in Bangalore has 1,000 beds. (The average American hospital has only 160.) His team of 40-some cardiologists cranks out 600 operations a week. Open-heart surgery costs about ,000 – compared with ,000-0,000 in an American hospital. Shetty and his team have performed tens of thousands of such operations with results as good as the best of American hospitals. Incredibly, these hospitals even make money! According to The Economist, “Dr Shetty’s family-owned hospital group reports a 7.7% profit after taxes, compared with 6.9% in American private hospitals.”

So where are the opportunities? I believe that the biggest opportunities and the biggest rewards will go to the homegrown companies in these markets. The biggest winners won’t be the multinationals, their present success notwithstanding. (And it hasn’t all been sugar and spice. Ask Google or Yahoo or Black & Decker or a host of others who met defeat in foreign markets.) As in baseball or football, the odds favor the home team, which has more knowledge of local markets, customs and the like.

For example, China’s auto market grew 45% last year to become the biggest in the world. GM, for the first time ever, now sells more cars in China than in the US. But Chinese automakers have made the largest market share gains. As of 2004, Chinese automakers were 21% of the market; today, they are 32% and rising. Of the 89 new models unveiled at the global auto show in Beijing recently, 75 were Chinese brands.

We are now at a point, too, at which we can list a host of companies that are world-class in what they do and call an emerging market home. Mittal as recently as 1990 was an unknown steel maker in Indonesia. Today, it’s the world’s largest steel company. China’s Lenovo didn’t even exist in 1990 and today is the world’s fourth largest PC maker. There are many more examples from Brazil’s Embraer to China’s battery maker BYD. Warren Buffett bought a piece of the latter company in September 2008. BYD went from about to in about 18 months. Needless to say, investors in these kinds of companies have reaped huge gains. And some of the biggest opportunities in the next 10 years will come from the next crop of Mittals and Embraers and BYDs.

The above is just a sampling of the mind-bending changes taking place right now in the Emerging Market economies. As the explorer, Marco Polo, once said, “I have not told the half of what I saw.”

Chris Mayer
for The Daily Reckoning

Emerging Market Investing: Why Your Portfolio Should Not Speak English originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, offers a uniquely refreshing, perspective on the global economy, investing, gold, stocks and today’s markets. Its been called “the most entertaining read of the day.”


Daily Reckoning
gold

Kan’s Election: Should We Expect A Weaker Japanese Yen?

On Monday, June 8, Naoto Kan formally became the prime minister of Japan. The former finance minister took the reigns from Yukio Hatoyama, who stepped down last week following popular outcry over a U.S. air base.

With Prime Minister Kan in office, good vibrations are beginning to surface. Political leaders have backed the former finance minister, voting by an overwhelming majority in the weekend election.  Of the 477 lawmakers voting, 313 voted in favor of Kan.  The public is also widely supportive of their new leader.  Since the election, Kan’s Democratic Party of Japan administration has garnered a 44% approval rating in public opinion polls.  The figure is a vast improvement from the less than 20% enthusiasm witnessed under Hatoyama’s government.

But is this optimism too good to be true? Japan’s government has been a notorious revolving door when it comes to political leaders, and Kan may not be any different. Additionally, there are foreign exchange implications since Kan, a fiscal conservative, has already voiced displeasure with the level of the Japanese yen.

That should be a big concern for investors, because Kan has a solid history of standing behind his convictions. In a political system where family and class still play a heavy hand in elections, he has always gone against the grain. While former Prime Minister Hatoyama is a fourth-generation politician of a well-known political family, Kan is the son of a white-collar executive in an upper middle-class family. His upbringing led him to question government intentions while sticking to roots grounded in transparency. It came in handy.

In 1996, Kan exposed a government cover-up, releasing documents that showed the health ministry knowingly allowed the public distribution of blood that was at risk for HIV contamination.  The incident solidified his reputation, helping him through a personal scandal linking him to an extramarital affair and missed payments to the national pension system. So while many questioned Hatoyama’s political motives and rather weak commitments to campaign promises, Kan’s “comeback kid” personality and strong political history helped him into office pretty much uncontested.

But he walks into leadership dealing with a country full of problems and no easy solutions.

On the foreign relations side of the card, Kan must address the discontent over Futenma — the Marine air base at the heart of Hatoyama’s departure. At the beginning of the September 2009 campaign, Hatoyama pledged to move the United States Marine air base out of Okinawa — a cause vastly supported by the regional population, especially by local residents. However, after intense discussions with U.S. leadership, Hatoyama allowed the base to stay — giving voters the idea that his administration was weak and unable to deliver on campaign promises.

But even with Hatoyama out of the way, the issue of Futenma still remains. It will continue to be a lingering frustration as Kan looks forward to developing stronger foreign ties with the United States. Those ties are extremely important, too, because of the other problem Kan must deal with — Japan’s shaky economy.

The Rising Sun Has Yet to Rise

Growth has slowed to a crawl for the country — which is still the world’s second-largest economy. Consumer interest is additionally down in the dumps, as deflation continues to cripple domestic investment and spending. Retail sales, a measure of consumer spending, remained negative for all 12 months of 2009 — falling as much as 5.8% in February–March.

Of course, the Japanese government hasn’t just stood by and watched things fall apart. Earlier last year, it injected almost 0 billion in tax cuts and subsidies to shore up the economy following the global financial crisis.  But all that spending hasn’t produced any real results. Overall gross domestic product is expected to rise by 1% percent, one-third the pace of the United States.

Central bank measures have also proved fruitless. Since 2009, the Bank of Japan has lowered rates to near zero, currently at 0.10%, and extended credit lines to ensure liquidity with domestic banks.   So fiscal and monetary policy options are both running thin, creating a rather difficult situation for Prime Minister Kan.

For the foreign exchange markets, the election of Naoto Kan means a continued conservative approach to currency valuation and economic development. Previous prime ministers have merely hinted that high volatility and extreme appreciation for the underlying Japanese yen was undesired. Kan is taking a different approach. Not only has he explicitly spoken against high volatility in exchange rates, he has also openly supported a weaker yen.

At press conferences held during his tenure as finance minister, Kan stated that exporters favored a U.S. dollar – Japanese yen exchange rate of 90. That level insures that Japanese exporters are able to reserve some level of competitiveness when it comes to exports. Should the rate move to 89 or beyond, Japanese products would become more and more uncompetitive as their goods rise in price against other currencies. So Prime Minister Kan will want to do his best in containing any yen strength if the Japanese economy is to recover.

All in all, what can we really expect from the newly elected prime minister? With a fiscal conservative in charge, the country will likely see relatively unprecedented tightening. Taxes may not go up, but spending will definitely be cut. With most programs under duress, including health and pensions, administrative cuts in spending will likely geared towards defense. Additionally, Kan is likely to impose his will on the central bank through his finance minister, Yushihiko Noda. Although Noda has proclaimed his neutrality in central bank decisions, look for Kan to push for anti deflationary measures — like lower interest rates and looser lending practices by banks.

FX market intervention is also a probable scenario as Kan looks to protect the yen from speculative appreciation in the short term.  The probability of any intervention in the currency is likely to keep buyers away from the market, helping the yen to weaken to 100 against the U.S. dollar.

Richard Lee
for The Daily Reckoning

Kan’s Election: Should We Expect A Weaker Japanese Yen? originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, offers a uniquely refreshing, perspective on the global economy, investing, gold, stocks and today’s markets. Its been called “the most entertaining read of the day.”


Daily Reckoning
gold

Why BP Should Just Deny Everything and Brace for Impact

Sittin’ on the dock of the bay…
Watchin’ the tide roll away…

– “(Sittin’ On) The Dock of the Bay”, Otis Reading

We’re glad we’re not sitting on the dock of the bay in Biloxi or St. Petersburg. There’s oil coming that way…and it’s not the kind you can burn in your lamp.

The newspapers say there are huge globs of oil beneath the surface…or floating on the top. You’d think you could just pump it up. At a barrel, you’d think you could make money scooping up the “sea oil” in the gulf. Probably better than shrimping.

Instead, everyone is complaining about it…and threatening to put BP executives in jail. Yesterday’s cover story in The Financial Times told us that the head man at BP has admitted error.

“BP ‘not prepared’ for spill”

We hope he had a good talk with his lawyers. “Not prepared” sounds like an admission of negligence. Maybe criminal negligence.

There are billions in lawsuits coming up…and the attorneys around the Gulf are slicker than an oil spill. The English don’t realize what they’re up against…an Alabama lawyer in a seersucker suit…talking to an Alabama jury…about how a British billion-dollar company destroyed their lives and livelihood.

They’re going to use every word Tony Hayward says against him.

Nobody is going to thank him for keeping his auto running. No one is going to think about where the oil comes from that he uses to heat his house…or how he draws electricity from an oil-fired power plant. No one in the entire state of Alabama is going to stand up for BP…certainly not an elected official.

“You have no idea how this works,” said a Washington friend. “The shyster lawyers are all in tight with the lawmakers. Many of them are shysters too. That’s why Obamacare is so tilted towards the lawyers and the pharmaceutical companies. They’re all in cahoots.

“And now this oil spill is going to set off a feeding frenzy on BP. The shyster lawyers are drawing up their class action strategies now. And you’ll see public interest groups get into the action. These guys are smart. And they’re very well funded. They’re going to short BP shares…and then announce a billion lawsuit. And every pseudo environmental group…and trade organization…and labor union…and city council…and cracker-jack collection of meddlers anywhere within 100 miles of the coast…they’re all going to be looking at that pay day…when BP settles for…what?…0 million… billion…who knows. But they can invest millions in the case, because they know the payoff will be huge. They’re just fighting for position now…seeing who can put together the winning jackpot case… It’s sickening.”

Legal advice to BP: deny everything. You weren’t there. Deepwater what? Then, tell litigants that you will never settle any case, no matter how big or how rich. That will vastly increase the investment capital the shysters need to raise.

BP’s share price has plummeted. Some people think it is time to buy. Might be a little too soon. Our guess is that estimates of the damage are going to balloon even higher as more and more lawyers begin to see that thanks to BP they can win the lottery without buying a ticket.

Also, we suspect that a downturn is coming in the entire energy sector. Why? Because energy use grows with GDP growth. And we suspect we’re in Deep Doo-Doo there too.

Savings rates are rising all over the world – in developed economies and in emerging economies. That means GDP growth should turn down.

From Yahoo Finance:

Americans pulled back on their spending in May after a tepid April, underscoring how fragile the consumer spending recovery remains, new data released Thursday show.

Cool weather and a quirk in the calendar – a late Memorial Day weekend that hurt May’s business but should boost June’s figures – dampened spending on almost everything from clothing to major appliances. The figures, from MasterCard Advisors’ SpendingPulse, include spending in all forms including cash from May 2 through Saturday.

But weakness in the past six weeks is due to more than thermostat and calendar flukes, analysts said. They cited unemployment, stock market jitters and the end of government funded rebates on energy-efficient appliances.

“I don’t think you can explain away all the weakness just based on the calendar shift,” said Michael McNamara, vice president of research and analysis for SpendingPulse.

People are reluctant to spend for all the usual reasons…and some new ones. In the past, people have feared losing jobs. Never before in recent history have they feared that the government would go broke.

Just ask young people what they expect to get from Social Security or the new Medicare program. They know the score. The old folks stacked the deck against them. All the aces come up first – while the boomers are still in the game. Then, nothing but low cards.

“‘Sittin’ on the dock of the bay’ was a protest song,” a communist friend once explained. “It’s about blacks who came to look for work in San Francisco and then couldn’t find a job.”

Maybe so.

Another report tells us that the corporate bond market is practically dead. Corporations can’t raise money for expansion…and don’t seem to want to. They’re being shut out of the credit market by government – particularly the US government. Bond rates are so low buyers don’t have much to look forward to – whether they buy the corporates or the Treasuries. They figure they might as well go for Treasuries. At least they’ll be sure to get paid back.

This year, the US government is expected to borrow an additional trillion. That doesn’t leave much money for the private sector. Which is why The Wall Street Journal report is surely correct; more and more people are going to be sitting on the dock of the bay…or watching TV. Unemployment is still increasing in most cities.

China Daily seemed to capture the underlying trend better than anyone. It’s headline:

“West moving towards deeper financial abyss.”

Into the Deep Doo Doo, in other words.

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning

Why BP Should Just Deny Everything and Brace for Impact originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, offers a uniquely refreshing, perspective on the global economy, investing, gold, stocks and today’s markets. Its been called “the most entertaining read of the day.”


Daily Reckoning
gold

Should Investors Boycott the Stock Market?

Investing in stocks is marketed as believing in America. Imbedded is the assumption that buying stocks is a fair deal. An investor might make or lose money, but the same chance was taken by all participants.

Although they have received little notice, the recently released 2004 Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (FOMC) transcripts show how the Fed was channeling its attention and distorting markets for the benefit of favored institutional investors. (See AuContrarian.com “blog” The 2004 Fed Transcripts: A Methodical, Diabolical Destruction of America’s “Wealth”.) The 2004 Transcripts were not so much a revelation as a confirmation. The Fed’s valiant attempt to prevent the economy from deflating (its claim at the time) by inflating asset markets is now a matter of public record. FOMC members explicitly stated they were working with hedge funds and pushing housing prices up.

We know how this ended. The Fed’s policy was successful until 2007. Then all asset prices collapsed, along with the institutions (banks and brokerages) that believed the Fed could prevent prices from ever falling. The backstop was known as the “Greenspan Put:” the belief that Chairman Greenspan’s Fed would always prevent market prices from falling.

A put option gives the buyer an option (a choice) to sell a security at a price previously negotiated with the seller. A put option is valuable if prices fall below the level of the negotiated price. An investor can buy a put with the right to sell the S&P 500 Index at 800. If the Index rises to 1100, the option is worthless. (Why sell it for 0 when it can be sold in the market for 00?) If the S&P 500 Index falls to 600, the value of the put option is worth at least 0 to the owner of the put: the Index is trading for 0 but can be sold for 0. The put option is an insurance policy against a stock market collapse. The need for the average investor to understand such instruments will be discussed below.

The Greenspan Put begat the Bernanke Put, once the latter became chairman in 2006. Believers in the Put have reason for such faith. The 2004 transcripts show the FOMC toiled to fulfill this zeal. The zealots ignore the failure of the Put in 2007 and 2008.

The credit collapse of 2007 and 2008 ended as all government-sponsored market support programs have ended.  In 2010, the federal government’s interference in markets is ten-fold, or possibly, one-hundred-fold, greater than in 2004. Distortions created by Fed interference in 2004 (such as, the mortgage market) went hand-in-hand with the collapse in 2007. Given the Fed’s iron grip on markets today, the imbalances are much greater. Investors need to plan now for when the contrivances shatter.

The busybodies’ catalogue would start with their zero-percent federal funds rate. This is not only an inducement to borrow without fear, it is also part of the Federal Reserve’s program to suck the unwashed into higher risk investments, such as the stock market and municipal bonds. Federal Reserve Governor Donald Kohn stated in the autumn of 2009: “[R]ecently the improvement, in risk appetites [have] respond[ed] to actions by the Federal Reserve and other authorities…. Low market interest rates should continue to induce savers to diversify into riskier assets….”

Investors should be aware of other means by which the Fed and other authorities are interfering with markets, since the mutations have created phony prices. Again, as we saw in 2007 and 2008, the compounding of illusionary prices finally collapsed.

Four sources of phony prices follow.

First, interest rates are distorted. At one percent (and less) speculators gamble and push up asset prices.

Second, is the housing market. It does not exist. The authorities have warned us. The latest was David Stevens, head of the Federal Housing Administration, who told an audience on May 24, 2010, the housing market is a “government-financed market” that is “purely on life-support, sustained by the Federal government.” House prices will sink when the government runs out of lifeboats.

Third, the authorities have handed the stock market to institutions where the computers buy and sell. The Financial Times reported that only 3% of stock market trading is by retail customers. Tradebot, in Kansas City, Missouri, holds stocks for an average of 11 seconds. It made money every day for four years.

Fourth, the Federal Reserve is manipulating the currency markets, as Rainer Bruederle, German finance minister, disclosed on May 28. Angst should border on panic, given the man in charge of this operation. The last time the Federal Reserve did so, in July 2009, Congressman Alan Grayson asked Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke to whom the Fed had lent 0 billion. The chairman had no idea. Bernanke claimed, legitimately, loan collection was the responsibility of the central banks that had received the funds. His detachment is in keeping with the man’s tendency to wander through vague abstractions, yet for those weighing the destination of their life savings, or, whether to buy a house or hide in a cave, Simple Ben is a dangerous obstacle to logical thinking.

In the 1970s, many in the United States knew little about personal finance other than the beauty of compound interest. It was during that decade when double-digit inflation chased those who were quick enough into certificates of deposits. The latecomers who did not adapt were left behind.

From certificates of deposit, the household has adapted to changing times (or, been left behind). Now, it is necessary to understand protection, which should not be confused with asset diversification. The put option described above is a potential instrument. There are other approaches; the costs of each should be weighed and this needs to be emphasized: all insurance is a cost.

This leads back to the title: “Should Investors Boycott the Stock Market?” In the current discussion: what is the cost of abandoning stocks, and, for instance, ducking inside a savings account?

For all Bernanke’s faults, there is at least a consistency about the man. His mind is as inflexible as a Prussian border guard’s. In 1999, he wrote: “A central bank can… extend loans to depositories, other financial intermediaries, or firms and households…. This may be particularly helpful in spurring aggregate demand should the financial sector be under stress and in need of liquefying its assets.” [My italics.] If Bernanke sees the economy sinking, there is nothing to stop the mad professor who dreamt up this conflagration from electronically wiring 0,000 to every American’s personal checking account. The Dow could pass 100,000 shortly after.

In conclusion, investors need protection on the downside and exposure to the upside. At the moment, the prospect of a stock market crash looks more likely.

Regards,

Frederick Sheehan,
for The Daily Reckoning

[For more of Frederick Sheehan's perspectives you can visit his blog at www.AuContrarian.com.]

Should Investors Boycott the Stock Market? originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, offers a uniquely refreshing, perspective on the global economy, investing, gold, stocks and today’s markets. Its been called “the most entertaining read of the day.”


Daily Reckoning
gold